“I had anticipated to see the complete panorama inexperienced, with cattle grazing contentedly, however the entire place is brown, identical to the remainder of India… I checked out your farmers. They’re good folks—farmers are at all times good folks—however they don’t seem to be as hardworking because the farmers of Punjab. I can’t discover a single purpose why Anand is such an excellent success. Now, are you able to inform me what’s the secret?” Shastri requested Verghese Kurien, then basic supervisor of the Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union, and the architect of India’s White Revolution, the world’s largest dairy growth programme that started in 1970. Anand was earlier part of Kaira district.
Kurien informed Shastri that his observations had been appropriate aside from one distinction. Anand dairy was owned by farmers and elected farmer representatives managed it. And Kurien was an worker of farmers who employed his companies as knowledgeable supervisor.
An excited Shastri then remarked that there isn’t a particular purpose to have Anand solely in Gujarat. “From tomorrow, you shall make it your small business to work not only for Anand, not only for Gujarat, however for the entire of India… please replicate Anand all through India,” Shastri informed Kurien.
In his autobiography, I Too Had a Dream, Kurien recounts the incident fondly, together with the bureaucratic hurdles he confronted in Delhi whereas placing the plan in movement. Questions had been additionally raised from throughout the Kaira milk union. “By creating extra Anands, aren’t you creating extra competitors for us?”
Kurien’s reply was prescient. One dairy for a rustic as giant as India wouldn’t be sufficient to fulfil its wants, he informed the union’s board. And crucially, Kurien added that “one Amul was just one stick—it might be damaged—100 Amuls collectively can be very tough to interrupt. Due to this fact, it could be in Amul’s curiosity to assist create extra of it.” Kaira Union launched the model Amul for advertising and marketing its product vary in 1955.
Within the many years that adopted, India constructed some of the formidable dairy cooperative actions globally. Per capita milk availability grew over four-fold, from 107 gm per day in Seventies to 427 gm in 2021, regardless of a rising inhabitants. Farmer members of cooperatives obtain between 75-85% of what the patron pays for dairy merchandise. This compares with 25-50% share in different farm merchandise.
Produced by over 80 million rural households, milk is the most important farm product valued at near ₹10 trillion yearly, as per official estimates. India can be the most important producer of milk on the earth—accounting for a fifth of worldwide output—regardless that productiveness per animal is low.
Since Operation Flood was launched in 1970, profitable dairy cooperatives emerged in numerous states. Amul is now a family identify throughout India with annual group income of ₹72,000 crore in 2022-23. It is usually the most important fast-moving client items (FMCG) model, surpassing the turnover of giants like Hindustan Unilever by a large margin ( ₹58,000 crore in 2022-23).
Moreover Amul, there’s Nandini in Karnataka (the second largest dairy cooperative with a turnover of ₹25,000 crore), Aavin in Tamil Nadu, Milma in Kerala, Gokul in Maharashtra, Verka in Punjab, Saras in Rajasthan, and Sudha in Bihar (the most important cooperative in jap India).
But, many are struggling financially. A 2020 analysis paper on farm worth chains printed by the Indian Council for Analysis on Worldwide Financial Relations (ICRIER), Delhi, discovered that 95 of the 175 milk unions it studied had been in loss. The majority of loss-making cooperatives—55 out of 95 unions—had been from Uttar Pradesh, the most important milk producing state.
The authors of the report famous that there was no try and restructure these co-operatives to make them environment friendly and accountable to farmers. This led to a collapse of cooperatives in states like Uttar Pradesh. Profitable ones just like the Gujarat Cooperative Milk Advertising Federation (GCMMF)— which now markets its merchandise underneath the Amul model and contains of 18 milk unions from the state together with Kaira —entered different states however didn’t comply with the Anand mannequin. Since farmers from different states can’t be members of GCMMF, it behaved like a benevolent non-public sector entity exterior Gujarat.
White Revolution 2.0
On this backdrop, union house and cooperation minister Amit Shah’s remarks on 30 December final yr created a furore. Whereas inaugurating a dairy mission in Mandya, Karnataka, the minister mentioned that Amul and Nandini will collectively arrange dairies in each village within the state in three years. The model Nandini is owned by the Karnataka Milk Federation, which contains of 16 milk unions from the state.
Opposition political events took this as a sign of a merger in future—regardless of a fast denial issued by the state chief minister. Nonetheless, a political slugfest continued forward of state elections, held on 10 Could. The incumbent Bharatiya Janata Social gathering (BJP) misplaced out to the Congress whose leaders had been usually seen frequenting Nandini milk parlours throughout election campaigning.
An ongoing technique of amending the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, launched within the Parliament in December 2022, on how board members will be elected by a course of managed by a central election authority, added to the confusion. The apprehension: it will likely be simpler to merge state cooperatives as soon as the amendments are by way of.
In March this yr, Amit Shah revealed the federal government’s plan to determine rural dairies in 200,000 panchayats throughout states—paving the way in which for White Revolution 2.0. However the form and type these rural dairies will take stays unclear. Up to now, a multi-state cooperative specializing in exports—which will probably be linked to those newly created rural dairies—has been arrange.
Consultants and business insiders Mint spoke to are studying these developments as a pivot in the direction of extra central management of cooperatives, a technique which might pay wealthy political dividends to the ruling BJP, by nurturing a vote financial institution of farmer-members throughout states. A pan-India mega model may additionally dilute the spirit of decentralization and deviate from Kurien’s thought of a whole lot of Amul-like manufacturers throughout India, some feared.
Mint despatched a listing of queries to the cooperation ministry however didn’t obtain a response.
Jayen Mehta, managing director of Amul, mentioned in a written response that there are not any plans to merge Amul with some other dairy cooperative. However Amul, along with six different national-level organizations, will probably be selling a bunch of multi-state cooperatives specializing in exports, seeds and natural produce.
“This can usher in a brand new period of cooperation throughout the nation for advantage of tens of millions of producers organized underneath such cooperatives,” Mehta mentioned.
Small vs Large
Whether or not or not India adjustments observe on how milk cooperatives are managed, there’s one other sore level on the lookout for a coverage repair: what occurs when a cooperative model turns into too large? Ought to or not it’s allowed to seize markets in different states and compete with smaller manufacturers? The query took a controversial flip just lately, when Amul introduced it’ll enter Nandini’s turf in Bengaluru.
“Whether it is potential to remodel Amul right into a multi-state cooperative which permits for membership from different states, then there’s a higher case for it to be going elsewhere… in any other case, it’s changing into an enormous company with a nationwide presence, benefiting solely the Gujarat farmers,” mentioned C Shambu Prasad, professor on the Institute of Rural Administration, Anand.
And if public sector banks can merge, why not cooperatives to create a nationwide model, Prasad asks.
“For farmers, the entry of Amul or Mom Dairy is often good from an financial perspective—it ensures higher costs wherever the cooperative construction is weak. But when that’s the mannequin we need to comply with, the entire cooperative motion (designed on Anand) goes for a toss,” mentioned T. Nanda Kumar, former head of the Nationwide Dairy Improvement Board (which owns the Mom Dairy model), and lead writer of the dairy sector report quoted earlier.
The unique thought was that village and district stage milk unions will be part of arms to type a state stage federation which can market dairy merchandise underneath a typical model. Worth added merchandise like butter and cheese bought underneath the model identify ensured increased margins and higher returns to farmers, as liquid milk is a low-margin product.
“There isn’t any drawback when Amul enters a milk deficit state to promote its surplus milk. However, as an example, in Maharashtra the place the state dairy model didn’t take off, a number of gamers together with Amul and personal dairies procuring milk resulted in low milk costs for farmers, in comparison with Gujarat, the place Amul is a robust establishment with a robust buy mechanism,” Kumar mentioned.
“So, can a nationwide stage cooperative guarantee a robust buy mechanism for farmers? Kurien didn’t consider so and therefore pushed for state-level federations. The query to ask is, will we permit manufacturers like Amul or Nandini to battle it out with smaller ones like Sudha or Aavin? Or ought to the centre assist states create robust native manufacturers?”
The counter-argument, Kumar added, is why ought to one object to Amul coming into one other state as it could enhance competitors, transparency and effectivity within the dairy worth chain. “I’ve no drawback with that argument. However I’m not positive if it may be used as an excuse to create a multi-state cooperative.”
Jayen Mehta from Amul denied any risk to cooperative manufacturers from one another. “The presence of multiple cooperative in a state is useful to farmers as a result of they’d in any other case be on the mercy of personal and multi-national gamers dictating costs,” Mehta mentioned.
The brand new cooperation ministry (arrange in July 2021), added Mehta, will assist usher within the subsequent White Revolution by organising cooperative societies in 200,000 of the five hundred,000 uncovered villages.
‘Straightforward to destroy’
One India-one model is a thought course of aligned with present-day political realities, mentioned a former dairy cooperative government who didn’t need to be named. “However making a nationwide stage mega model runs the danger of political and bureaucratic seize.”
Multinational dairy giants had been unable to crack India’s dairy market because of the energy of profitable cooperatives. This might change too, if the present construction is upended, the individual quoted above added.
Sudha from Bihar presents the angle of a comparatively smaller model. With ₹5,000 crore turnover, it lacks the muscle to compete with an Amul. “Amul presents our farmers 25-50 paisa extra (per litre) to seize the liquid milk provide in some space. We spend cash and energy to develop the dairy sector in Bihar whereas Amul is simply concerned about gaining market share. This unfair competitors will finally damage farmers. Additionally, this can be a wastage of state funds used to help native dairies (for fodder, synthetic insemination, and veterinary companies),” mentioned Sanjay Kumar, chairman of Sudha dairy.
“We have now not obtained any proposal on creation of a multi-state cooperative. However I see no purpose in dismantling a system the place it’s working nicely,” Kumar added.
It appears virtually inconceivable to merge robust native manufacturers right into a nationwide one as states would object vigorously, mentioned Ajay Vir Jakhar, former head of the Punjab Farmers Fee. “However I think about Amul to be a state-sponsored monopoly. It went to states (exterior Gujarat) and destroyed native cooperatives by predatory pricing. After which walked out on farmers when there was a provide glut and costs crashed. We noticed that in Punjab.”
One can rely some advantages of a multi-state cooperative big at a nationwide stage—like benefits of scale, regional balancing (of provide and demand) and logistics—however these don’t add as much as a lot, mentioned M.S. Sriram, professor of public coverage at Indian Institute of Administration, Bangalore.
“Bigger a cooperative turns into, the lesser is its accountability to members… and it turns into extra weak to a technocratic seize with a choose few taking all selections. A profitable cooperative is tough to construct, however it’s simple to destroy.”
Obtain The Mint Information App to get Day by day Market Updates & Dwell Enterprise Information.
Extra
Much less
Supply: Live Mint